Past performance

Delivered work and measured results, labelled by type.

Results in cost, time and control where they were measured, with each case labelled for what it is: commercial client delivery, internal R&D, a current engagement or the experience of our key personnel. Clients are described by size and sector; client permission governs what we name. Scope, platforms and results are confirmed in writing on request.

Evaluation

Commercial past performance, presented for relevance

Our past performance is commercial client delivery and internal R&D. The FAR tells evaluators how to treat an offeror without a record of relevant past performance, and we give the scope and the measured results so yours can judge relevance.

U.S. federal acquisitionKey date: September 30, 2025

FAR Part 15 (overhaul deviation text): offerors without past performance, 15.202(c)(1)

Model deviation text issued September 30, 2025 and used through agency class deviations; the Part 15 proposed rule published September 18, 2026 (comments closed October 19, 2026) keeps 15.202(c)(1) unchanged; no final rule yet. Legacy citation FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv); the same rule is in statute at 41 U.S.C. 1126(b).

“An offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.”

What we do: We present commercial past performance with its scope and measured results so your evaluators can judge its relevance.

Source: FAR Part 15 (overhaul deviation text) (acquisition.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 12, 2026

Where we have delivered

Client delivery

Figures by case, with how each was measured where that is on record.

Client delivery · commercial

One governed intake for a project portfolio

A Fortune 50 energy, oil and gas company · PMO and demand management

The PMO ran on disconnected demand and project tools held together by spreadsheets, and exceptions had become the normal path through the process. We standardized demand and project management around how each department spends: one record for projects, governed intake, approval and vendor-compliance workflows, and live portfolio reporting.

40% fewer
Compliance exceptions across the portfolio
30% faster
Delivery schedule across the portfolio
20 hrs/month
PMO hours returned each month
Compliance exceptions across the portfolio
Counted over the quarter after implementation and compared with the count measured before; the baseline also recorded the average duration across all exceptions.
Delivery schedule across the portfolio
Counted over the quarter after implementation, against the lag and lead times the organization had already measured before.

The scale of the work: an IT portfolio of $250MM annual, with 300+ projects/year governed.

Project Online · SharePoint · Power Automate · Power Apps · Power BI
Client delivery · commercial

A financial close that traces every figure to its source

The same company · finance and capital governance

Month-end consolidation ran through shared workbooks fed by ERP plug-ins. A joint finance and IT team redesigned the process, then we built a governed Microsoft Fabric lakehouse with semantic models and Power BI on top, with change control and automated validation in the release pipeline. Portfolio approvals moved to one simpler process.

80% less
Manual consolidation and reporting work
4 days → 1 day
Month-end close
2 days → 1 hour
Total time to approval in the simpler process
Level 1 → Level 4
PMO maturity on the OPM3 scale
Total time to approval in the simpler process
The sum of the times to approval in the former, more complex process, against the same sum in the simpler overall process after implementation.
PMO maturity on the OPM3 scale
Assessed by our accountable architect together with the client's IT Leadership Team (ITLT), which gave the final alignment on the levels.
Microsoft Fabric · Power BI · Azure Data Factory · Azure DevOps
Client delivery · commercial

Requirements engineering and vendor selection for a managed-services contract

A German-based pharmaceutical manufacturer

Our scope was the decision: requirements engineering, the RFP, shortlisting, interviews, and scoring and ranking the vendors, with an enterprise architect owning the requirements of each system. The client appointed the recommended managed-services provider for the full term.

This is the work agencies buy before a competition. FAR 9.505-2 governs what may follow it, and we ask your contracting team to state that in the contract before we start.

5,000 seats
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement in scope
5-year contract
Term of the managed-services contract
40+ applications
Applications consolidated under the contract
36 technical resources
Technical resources redeployed
Microsoft 365 · Azure · requirements engineering · RFP and scoring matrix
Client delivery · commercial

Offer pricing on a Dataverse model, backtested on historical offer data

A U.S. supplier of water and wastewater treatment equipment to municipal utilities

Municipal treatment projects were priced by hand through a cost chain of currency, freight, tariffs, overhead and margin. We digitized the historical offers into regression-based pricing models and delivered a Power Apps application on Microsoft Dataverse, built as repeatable code under our own solution publisher, with a governed draft-to-final proposal workflow and a complete audit record.

~28 offers
Historical offers modelled
~14 US states
U.S. states covered by the offers
R² up to 0.999 · mean error as low as 0.7%
Fit of the regression pricing model
On historical offer data.
4 custom Dataverse tables
Custom Dataverse tables
Microsoft Dataverse · Power Apps · Power Platform ALM · Microsoft Entra ID
Client delivery · commercial

Operations on one Microsoft platform while opening new plants

A Houston plastics manufacturer

Point tools were consolidated onto Dynamics 365 Business Central, with Power Automate approvals, Power BI production measures and onboarding in Microsoft Teams. Innovations24 then ran the estate as managed-service and licensing provider while the client scaled across two new plants.

20% lower
Licensing cost after consolidation
50% faster
Onboarding to the first role-specific work product
>90% within three months
On-time manufacturing
4 days → 2 days
Month-end close
Onboarding to the first role-specific work product
Time to the first final work product specific to a role, blended across office administration, warehouse operations, sales and procurement.
Dynamics 365 Business Central · Power Platform · Microsoft 365 · Azure
Client delivery · commercial

AI vision that finds qualified targets in satellite imagery and public data

A manufacturing sales organization

Azure OpenAI vision models estimated facility types from imagery and public data, with a confidence score on every result; candidates were scored for fit and routed as leads by territory. Conversion from first contact to sales-accepted lead improved in the pilot regions.

15–20 days → 3–5 days
Lead-to-outreach cycle
The client's own before-and-after figures; directional.
~5×
Faster from first lead to outreach
The client's own before-and-after figures; directional.
Lead-to-outreach cycle
The client's own before/after reading across the USA, including its island territories.
Faster from first lead to outreach
The client's own before/after reading across the USA, including its island territories.
Azure OpenAI · Azure Data Factory · Microsoft Fabric · Power BI · Dynamics 365 Sales
Client delivery · public-sector adjacent

Housing assistance automated during the COVID-19 response

A nonprofit administering emergency housing assistance

We automated intake and case processing for emergency housing assistance: public-program delivery under time pressure, with the auditability its funders relied on.

Microsoft Power Platform · document automation · workflow governance
Internal R&D

Our own platform

Internal R&D · Azure AI

Opportunity intelligence: AI bid triage on Azure

Our own Azure-native platform reads new government solicitations from monitored public sources, among them SAM.gov, USASpending, Grants.gov and FPDS, and turns them into a ranked, explainable pipeline with eligibility gates, certification-gap analysis and an agent-generated, requirement-by-requirement compliance matrix.

Collection is public-data-only by design: a source allowlist in code, database constraints, collectors that honor robots.txt and an AI prompt policy, and no access to source-selection information. One high-value source was declined because its terms disallow collection.

10+
Public sources monitored
~9,200 lines
Lines of Python, Bicep, TypeScript and SQL
93
Backend tests
14 Bicep modules
The platform's infrastructure, deployed as code
Azure OpenAI · Microsoft Foundry agents · Azure Document Intelligence · Azure Functions · Azure SQL vector search · Microsoft Entra ID · Key Vault · Bicep
Current engagement

Work in progress

Current engagement (November 2026)

An Inventory Excellence digital twin

Current engagement (November 2026): an Inventory Excellence digital twin to facilitate scheduling, trading and hedging, for a Fortune 500 integrated Energy, Oil & Gas company.

The work is in progress, so this card describes the scope; results follow once they are measured and the client agrees.

Key personnel experience

Experience of our key personnel

Work and roles of our principal, described without figures.

Key personnel experience · regulated pharmaceuticals

Validated electronic-signature workflows for GxP approvals

A global pharmaceutical company

Signature workflows on SharePoint with Power Automate and Power Apps, Microsoft Entra ID with conditional access and multi-factor authentication for high-risk signatures, and immutable record stores, validated with IQ, OQ and PQ evidence. The same discipline of audit trails, controlled access and data integrity applies to federal records programs.

SharePoint · Power Automate · Power Apps · Microsoft Entra ID · validated environments
Key personnel experience · healthcare

Project portfolio management integration

A major U.S. pediatric hospital system

A systems integration for project portfolio management, with portfolio, program and project balancing: the same questions of demand, capacity and funding answered at each level from the same data.

Key personnel experience · advisory role of the principal

University of Illinois Net-Zero Center of Excellence

Our principal, Jakub Marciniak, serves as advisor for AI and technology to the Net-Zero Center of Excellence, University of Illinois. This is an advisory role held by the principal.

Need references or a scope confirmation?

References, scope confirmations and points of contact for the client cases are available to acquisition teams and teaming partners on request; client permission governs what we name.