The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (HB 149), SB 1964 and the AI rules DIR adopted under it set duties for state agencies, local governments and their vendors, and HB 3512 sets AI training for their staff.
TexasKey date: January 1, 2026
Texas TRAIGA (HB 149): disclosure when a governmental agency's AI interacts with consumers (Bus. & Com. Code §552.051)
In force since January 1, 2026.
“shall disclose to each consumer, before or at the time of interaction”
What we do: Every public-facing agent we build for a Texas agency tells people they are talking to AI before the conversation starts, in wording your counsel approves.
Source: Texas TRAIGA §552.051 disclosure (capitol.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026
TexasKey date: January 1, 2026
Texas TRAIGA (HB 149): uses prohibited for governmental entities (§§552.053–552.054) and who is covered (§552.001)
In force since January 1, 2026; hospital districts and institutions of higher education are outside the definition of governmental entity.
“A governmental entity may not use or deploy an artificial intelligence system that evaluates”
What we do: Before a use case is ranked, we screen it against the uses Texas law prohibits for government: social scoring that leads to unjustified or detrimental treatment, and biometric identification without consent that infringes a person's rights.
Source: Texas TRAIGA prohibited uses (capitol.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026
TexasKey date: January 1, 2026
Texas TRAIGA (HB 149): the NIST Generative AI Profile in the enforcement provisions (§552.105(e))
In force since January 1, 2026; a defense in Attorney General enforcement actions for a defendant that discovers a violation through an internal review process while substantially complying with the framework.
“the defendant discovers a violation of this chapter through: … (D) if the defendant substantially complies with the most recent version of the "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile" published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or another nationally or internationally recognized risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems, an internal review process.”
What we do: We map the delivery to the NIST AI RMF and its Generative AI Profile, the frameworks Texas law names, and keep the risk screen, the test results and the review records with your team.
Source: Texas TRAIGA §552.105(e) NIST profile (capitol.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026
TexasKey date: January 1, 2026
Texas TRAIGA (HB 149): the DIR regulatory sandbox (Bus. & Com. Code ch. 553)
Enacted, effective January 1, 2026; as of November 10, 2026 DIR has not proposed or adopted the rule that prescribes the application form (§553.052(b)), so how the sandbox runs in practice is not yet published.
“The department, in consultation with the council, shall create a regulatory sandbox program”
What we do: A Proof of Value readout carries what a sandbox report asks for: performance metrics (measured against a baseline), how the risks are mitigated, and feedback from users and affected stakeholders.
Source: Texas TRAIGA DIR sandbox (capitol.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026
Texas (state agencies, local governments and other DIR customers)Key date: September 1, 2025
Texas SB 1964: the Public Sector AI Sandbox (Gov. Code §2054.706)
In force since September 1, 2025; DIR says participation details will be published when available (checked November 10, 2026).
“The department shall establish and administer a program to support eligible entities in contracting with vendors to engage in research, development, training, testing, and other pre-deployment activities related to artificial intelligence systems”
What we do: A Proof of Value readout reports the performance measures and risk mitigation strategies the sandbox's quarterly report asks for, ready for your agency and the sandbox vendor it contracts with.
Source: Texas SB 1964 (capitol.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 12, 2026
Texas (state agencies and local governments)Key date: September 1, 2025
Texas SB 1964: heightened scrutiny AI systems, the AI code of ethics and vendor duties (Gov. Code §§2054.003, 2054.702, 2054.703, 2054.708)
In force since September 1, 2025; DIR's implementing rules (1 TAC chapter 219: the AI code of ethics, the risk and impact assessments and the vendor risk-framework requirement) took effect March 18, 2026, and DIR publishes the standardized notice form (AI System Facts).
“A state agency that deploys or uses a heightened scrutiny artificial intelligence system or a vendor that contracts with a state agency for the deployment or use of a heightened scrutiny artificial intelligence system shall conduct a system assessment that outlines:”
What we do: When a system will make, or be a controlling factor in, a decision about access to a government service, we document whether it meets the heightened-scrutiny definition for your agency's inventory, draft the risk assessment DIR's rules ask for, write the impact assessment Texas asks of a state agency and its vendor (or the review a local government completes), and prepare DIR's standardized notice for your agency to publish.
Source: Texas SB 1964 (capitol.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026
Texas (state agencies, institutions of higher education and, in limited scope, local governments)Key date: March 18, 2026
Texas DIR AI rules (1 TAC chapter 219): the AI code of ethics and the minimum standards for heightened scrutiny AI systems
Adopted; in effect since March 18, 2026.
“A state agency or local government that contracts with vendors to deploy a heightened scrutiny AI system shall mitigate third party risk by contractually requiring those vendors to implement an AI risk management framework such as that published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or a comparable standard for heightened scrutiny AI systems.”
What we do: When we deliver a heightened scrutiny AI system, the statement of work maps our delivery to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, the framework the rule names, and we prepare the impact assessment when your agency asks for it.
Source: Texas DIR AI rules (1 TAC chapter 219) (sos.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026
Texas (state agencies and local governments)Key date: September 1, 2025
Texas HB 3512: certified AI training for state and local government staff
In force since September 1, 2025.
“certify at least five artificial intelligence training programs for state and local government employees”
What we do: Our change work builds on the AI awareness training your staff complete under Texas law.
Source: Texas HB 3512 (capitol.texas.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026
U.S. federal (voluntary framework; named by Texas law)Key date: January 26, 2023
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and the Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1)
AI RMF 1.0 released January 26, 2023 and being revised under the AI Action Plan; NIST AI 600-1 released July 26, 2024.
“The AI RMF 1.0 is being revised as part of the White House AI Action Plan.”
What we do: We map the delivery to the NIST AI RMF and its Generative AI Profile, and keep the risk screen, the test results and the review records with your team.
Source: NIST AI Risk Management Framework (nist.gov) (opens in a new tab) · Checked November 10, 2026